The present paper is a significant study in numerical turbulent combustion which can be used in several combustion applications, and it is one of the complex research topics in the field of combustion.

Authors could able to simulate a numerical turbulent combustion with heat loss and fuel stratification using a valuable FGM method which is completely compatible with experimental data in a lot of physical cases, as it is shown in the Fig.16.Although there are some simplification such as fixing Lewis Number into 1, the overall value of the current work is high enough to be published in one of the reputable journals in the field of combustion.

A novel numerical method entitled FGM.

The application of FGM in combustion with heat loss, fuel stratification and turbulence has never been studied in literature. It means that the whole of the paper, especially the application of FGM in turbulent combustion is new and novel.

To be honest, the organization of the current paper has some issues. Forinstance, section 2-Combustion Modeling: the Flamelet-Generated Manifold Method-shouldn't be a separate section. It would be combined by introduction section, as it also a literature review section. There are also some weaknessesinside the text. For example, sentences which have been highlighted with yellow color are completely simple sentences which would be eliminated from the text. In addition, some sentences which have been highlighted with violet color must have appropriate references, as they are some findings from the literature. Please find the attached file to see the highlighted sentences. Furthermore, in some sentences the number of used references should be decreased into maxi- mum 2or 3 references. This references have been highlighted by green color in the attached file.

Yes, the presented data have been analyzed in an appropriate format, although in some cases there are some weaknesses. For example, as it is mentioned before, some scientific sentences need to have appropriate references, which have been highlighted in violet color in the attached PDF file.

Just in figure number 3, permission of the publisher should be received before republishing the mentioned figure in the text.

Yes, it is. There is no issue in the language of the current paper.

As it is a valuable piece in the field of turbulent combustion phenomenon,I think that it can be published in relevant and technical journals by IF range of 3-5. The best journal for this paper is Combustion and Flame which has a normal IF, and it's 4.168. In my point of view, the relevance of the joumal to the paper is moreimportant than the IF of the journal, and as I said before, based on the value of the paper,I suggest technical journals such as "Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, IF=4.303"and "Combustion and Flame, IF=4.168.

Level(1/2/3)2

Impact Factor: 4.168

Publication cycle: 6 months

The advantage of submitting this paper to Combustion and Flame journal is that the mentioned journal is very reputable in the field of combustion phenomenon although it has low IF comparing to the others.Disadvantages of submiting this paper to Combustion and Flame jourmal is that the review process in this journal sometimes is unacceptable and too long.It need a little patience.

Level(1/2/3)2

Impact Factor: 4.303

Publication cycle: 2～3 months

Although it is the valuable journal in the field of combustion. it has strict roles which make it very hard to publish a paperthere.But the advantages of this journal is its reviewing time which is about 2-3 months.

Level(1/2/3)3

Impact Factor: 1.863

Publication cycle: 6~12 weeks

It is more relevant to the current paper, but it has a lower IF. So, it may have a short review time, but it will be more difficult to address the comment, and it has a low IF comparing to the two previous journals.